4.8 Article

Solar-assisted integrated biogas solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) installation in wastewater treatment plant: Energy and economic analysis

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages 620-638

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.070

Keywords

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell; Heat recovery; Solar energy; WWTP; Biogas; Economic analysis

Funding

  1. Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking [671470]
  2. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A unique cogeneration system integrating a biogas fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) and a Concentrating Solar Thermal (CST) system for a reference Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) in Italy is proposed. Biogas which is locally in the WWTP from the anaerobic digestion (AD) of the collected sludge can be used to produce electricity using SOFC power modules. The thermal power recovered from the SOFC exhaust stream is used to meet part of the digester thermal load. However, the rest heat loads are provided by using the integration with the CST system and an auxiliary boiler. Energy analysis is performed to determine the effect of using the solar heating system on the system performance. Also, the economic performance is evaluated through a cash-flow analysis and the calculation of the Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). It is observed that installing 300 m(2), 700 m(2), 1100 m(2) of solar collectors could cover 8%, 18% and 30% of total digester heat load, respectively. Results show an overall beneficial effect of the solar installation, both from an energy and economic standpoint of view. For all the scenarios analyzed, the LCOE is lower than the grid electricity price and, with increasing solar integration, the value is further reduced showing that, despite the investment return time, the electricity production during the entire system lifetime is competitive against grid electricity prices. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available