4.1 Article

Dietary Patterns in Puerto Rican and Mexican-American Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 341-348

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10903-016-0398-y

Keywords

Dietary patterns; DASH-style diet; Breast cancer survivors; Puerto Ricans; Mexican-Americans

Funding

  1. NIH [U54 CA 96297, P30 CA016672]
  2. NCR [2G12-RR003051]
  3. NIMHHD [5G12-MD007600-29]
  4. Center for Energy Balance in Cancer Prevention and Survivorship, Duncan Family Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among Hispanic women. Certain dietary factors have been associated with the risk of breast cancer recurrence, but data in Hispanic survivors is scarce. Objective: to examine dietary patterns and diet quality in two groups of Hispanic breast cancer survivors. Methods: 23 Mexican-American (MA) and 22 Puerto Rican (PR) female breast cancer survivors completed a culturally adapted validated food frequency questionnaire. Intake was standardized per 1000 kcal and compared to US Dietary Guidelines and the DASH-style diet adherence score was calculated. Results: Overweight/obese was 70 % in MA and 91 % in PR. PR consumed diets rich in fruit/100 % fruit juices and beans, while MA diets were high in vegetables, beans, and total grains. Both groups consumed high amounts of starchy vegetables, refined grains, animal protein and calories from solid fats and added sugars but low intakes of whole grains, dairy products and nuts and seeds. DASH scores were relatively low. Conclusion: MA and PR female breast cancer survivors have different dietary patterns but both groups had relatively low diet quality. These groups could benefit from culturally tailored interventions to improve diet quality, which could potentially reduce cancer recurrence. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01504789.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available