4.1 Review

Progress with Structure - Activity Relationship modelling of occupational chemical respiratory sensitizers

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000355

Keywords

chemical respiratory sensitizers; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; occupational asthma; QSAR models; structure-activity relationships

Funding

  1. Colt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This appraises currently available computer-based ('in silico') models relating the molecular structure of low molecular weight compounds to their respiratory sensitization hazard. The present review places focus on the two main applications of such structure-activity relationship (SAR) models: hypotheses on disease mechanisms and toxicological prediction. Recent findings Analyses of the chemical structures of low molecular weight organic compounds known to have caused occupational asthma has led to the development of mechanistic alerts usually based on electrophilic reaction chemistry and protein cross-linking potential. Protein cross-linking potential has also been found to be a consistent feature of chemicals that have caused human cases of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Stepwise iteration of quantitative SAR (QSAR) modelling has shown appreciable improvements in predictivity for occupational asthma hazard and useful prospects for practical application. A good case has also been made for the potential use of structural alert-based mechanistic SARs in predictive toxicology. Summary Further understanding of the molecular interactions between chemical respiratory sensitizers and components of human proteins have been obtained from in-vitro and in-silico techniques. There have been developments in both qualitative (mechanistic) SARs and QSARs, which offer potential for use in a predictive algorithm for the toxicological screening of industrial chemicals for respiratory sensitization potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available