4.7 Article

Magnetical hollow fiber bar collection of extract in homogenous ionic liquid microextraction of triazine herbicides in water samples

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 409, Issue 10, Pages 2569-2579

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0201-5

Keywords

Homogeneous ionic liquid microextraction; Ionic liquid; Magnetical hollow fiber bar collection; Triazine herbicides; Environmental water samples

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Project of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China [2012IK162, 2013IK162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The homogeneous ionic liquid microextraction combined with magnetical hollow fiber bar collection was developed for extracting triazine herbicides from water samples. These analytes were separated and determined by high performance liquid chromatography. The triazines were quickly extracted into ionic liquid microdroplets dispersed in solution, and then these microdroplets were completely collected with magnetical hollow fiber bars; the pores of which were impregnated with hydrophobic ionic liquid, which makes the phase separation simplified with no need of centrifugation. Some experimental parameters, such as the type of ionic liquid, ultrasonic immersion time of hollow fiber, pH of sample solution, volume of hydrophilic ionic liquid, amount of ion-pairing agent NH4PF6, NaCl concentration, number of magnetical hollow fiber bar, stirring rate, and collection time were investigated and optimized. When the present method was applied to the analysis of real water samples, the precision and recoveries of six triazine herbicides vary from 0.1 to 9.2% and 73.4 to 118.5%, respectively. The detection limits for terbumeton, ametryn, prometryn, terbutryn, trietazine, and dimethametryn were 0.48, 0.15, 0.15, 0.14, 0.35, and 0.16 mu g L-1, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available