4.6 Article

Characteristic analysis of rainstorm-induced catastrophe and the countermeasures of flood hazard mitigation about Shenzhen city

Journal

GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 1886-1897

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2017.1392368

Keywords

Rainstorm-flood; disaster magnitude; temporal-spatial distribution; disaster mitigation; Shenzhen City

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71373131, 41501555, 91546117]
  2. National Social Science Foundation [16ZDA047]
  3. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, TAPP [PPZY2015A072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the statistical data of rainstorm-induced catastrophe about Shenzhen city during 1980-2014, this paper constructs a calculation model of disaster magnitude, which includes three influence factors: death toll, direct economic loss and disaster affected population. At the same time, the relationship between the disaster magnitude and the temporal, spatial and cause of the rainstorm-induced catastrophe about Shenzhen city is analysed, The results show that (1) The classification of catastrophe risk is carried out by the result of the disaster magnitude model. (2) The region where the disaster occurs frequently and seriously is located in the Midwest, and the disaster occurs infrequently and lightly is located in the south-east. (3) The rainstorm-induced catastrophe about Shenzhen City is mostly caused by persistent short-time heavy rainfall. While it occurs most frequently in July, and the most serious in September affected by the typhoon. (4) The main reasons for the occurrence of rainstorm-induced catastrophe about Shenzhen City are flood, waterlogging, tide and typhoon, of these factors waterlogging is the primary one. Finally, this paper puts forward the corresponding countermeasures of flood hazard mitigation in Shenzhen City.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available