4.5 Article

Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea

Journal

GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL
Volume 33, Issue 9, Pages 1000-1015

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1323964

Keywords

Landslide susceptibility; random forest; boosted tree; GIS; Korea

Funding

  1. Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) - Minister of Science, ICT and Future Planning of Korea
  2. Mid-career Researcher Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [NRF-2015R1A2A2A01005018]
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [18-3111-1] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A2A01005018] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landslides susceptibility maps were constructed in the Pyeong-Chang area, Korea, using the Random Forest and Boosted Tree models. Landslide locations were randomly selected in a 50/50 ratio for training and validation of the models. Seventeen landslide-related factors were extracted and constructed in a spatial database. The relationships between the observed landslide locations and these factors were identified by using the two models. The models were used to generate a landslide susceptibility map and the importance of the factors was calculated. Finally, the landslide susceptibility maps were validated. Finally, landslide susceptibility maps were generated. For the Random Forest model, the validation accuracy in regression and classification algorithms showed 79.34 and 79.18%, respectively, and for the Boosted Tree model, these were 84.87 and 85.98%, respectively. The two models showed satisfactory accuracies, and the Boosted Tree model showed better results than the Random Forest model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available