4.7 Article

A simple and rapid method for isotopic analysis of nickel, copper, and zinc in seawater using chelating extraction and anion exchange

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 967, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.03.010

Keywords

Isotope ratio; Anion exchange; NOBIAS; Ocean; Trace metals; Reference material

Funding

  1. Research Institute for Humanity and Nature [2016-8]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [15H01727]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H02142, 15H01727, 26610182, 15H05826, 26550020, 15H05830, 15K21712] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable isotope ratios of nickel, copper, and zinc are powerful tools for elucidating the biogeochemical cycling of trace metals in the ocean. However, analytical difficulties have impeded isotopic studies of these metals. We present a simple and rapid method for simultaneous analysis of Ni, Cu, and Zn isotope ratios in seawater using NOBIAS Chelate-PA1 resin and anion exchange resin. A NOBIAS Chelate-PA1 resin column was used to quantitatively collect Ni, Cu, and Zn from seawater and thoroughly remove the seawater matrix. Subsequent anion exchange purified and separated the Ni, Cu, and Zn from each other. The blanks used in this method (0.22 ng for Ni, 0.29 ng for Cu, and 0.53 ng for Zn) were sufficiently low to determine the isotope ratios of Ni, Cu, and Zn in surface seawater. Using this method, we analyzed GEOTRACES reference seawater samples (i.e., SAFe D1 and SAFe D2), National Research Council Canada certified materials (i.e., CASS-5 and NASS-6), and seawater samples collected from different depths in the subarctic South Pacific. The results were consistent with previously reported values. This method is expected to accelerate isotopic research and contribute to our understanding of biogeochemical cycling in the ocean. (C) 2017 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available