4.5 Article

A comparative study on groundwater spring potential analysis based on statistical index, index of entropy and certainty factors models

Journal

GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL
Volume 33, Issue 7, Pages 754-769

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1299801

Keywords

Groundwater spring potential; statistical index; index of entropy; certainty factors; China

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41472234]
  2. Research Cultivation Fund of Xi'an University of Science and Technology [201722]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main aim of this study is to generate groundwater spring potential maps for the Ningtiaota area (China) using three statistical models namely statistical index (SI), index of entropy (IOE) and certainty factors (CF) models. Firstly, 66 spring locations were identified by field surveys, out of which, 46 (70%) spring locations were randomly selected for training the models and the rest 20 (30%) spring locations were used for validation. Secondly, 12 spring influencing factors, namely slope angle, slope aspect, altitude, profile curvature, plan curvature, sediment transport index, stream power index, topographic wetness index, distance to roads, distance to streams, lithology and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were derived from the spatial database. Subsequently, using the mentioned factors and the three models, groundwater spring potential values were calculated and the results were plotted in ArcGIS 10.0. Finally, the area under the curve was used to validate groundwater spring potential maps. The results showed that the IOE model, with the highest success rate of 0.9126 and the highest prediction rate of 0.9051, showed the preferable performance in this study. The results of this study may be helpful for planners and engineers in groundwater resource management and other similar watersheds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available