4.1 Article

Bivalent flagellin immunotherapy protects mice against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in both acute pneumonia and burn wound models

Journal

BIOLOGICALS
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 29-37

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.12.005

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Flagellin a plus b; Antibody; Burn; Acute pneumonia

Funding

  1. University of Medical Sciences [94-05-30-27231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a serious challenge to therapy because of the complex pathogenesis and paucity of new effective antibiotics, thus renewing interest in antibody-based therapeutic strategies. Immunotherapy strategies typically target selected virulence factors that are expressed by the majority of clinical strains of P. aeruginosa, particularly because virulence factors mediate infection. Type a and b flagellins (flagellin a+b) of P. aeruginosa are acute virulence factors that play a major role in the establishment of infection. Here we evaluate the protective efficacy of antibodies raised against flagellin a+b in both acute pneumonia and burn models. A combination strategy using antibodies against flagellin a+b provided greater protection against cell invasion and enhanced opsono-phagocytosis and decreased motility of P. aeruginosa strains, compared to strategies using antibodies against a single flagellin. Antibodies against flagellin a+b-protected mice infected with P. aeruginosa strains significantly reduced bacterial dissemination from the site of infection to the liver and spleen. Passive immunization with antibodies against flagellin a+b led to an efficacious protection against P. aeruginosa infection in both acute pneumonia and burn models. (C) 2016 International Alliance for Biological Standardization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available