4.7 Article

Adsorption of resorcinol from aqueous solution onto CTAB/NaOH/flyash composites: Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 526-538

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2016.11.035

Keywords

Adsorption; Resorcinol; Flyash composite; Surfactant; Kinetic modelling

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC)
  2. Fly ash Mission of Department of Science & Technology (DST), New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The contamination of water by organic pollutant viz. phenolic compounds is a worldwide environmental problem due to their highly toxic nature. The resorcinol adsorption efficiencies for fly ash (FA), NaOH treated fly ash (NaFA) and surfactant modified NaOH treated fly ash (CTAB/NaOH/flyash composite) were compared. CTAB/NaOH/flyash composite presented higher resorcinol adsorption efficiency than FA and NaFA. This may be attributed to the hydrophobicity imparted by surfactant molecules on the surface of NaFA, consequently leading to organic partioning. The adsorption of resorcinol onto CTAB/NaOH/flyash composite as a function of initial resorcinol concentration, contact time, temperature, ionic strength and solution pH were investigated for their optimization. The adsorbent were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electro-microscope (FE-SEM), surface area and porosity measurement, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) etc. The adsorption kinetics of resorcinol followed a pseudo-second order model. The equilibrium adsorption data were best fitted by Redlich-Peterson isotherm. The resorcinol adsorption capacity slightly decreased with increasing ionic strength adjusted by NaCl. The adsorption was relatively high at solution pH 5.0-6.8 and decreased above pH 7.0. The value of Delta G degrees, Delta S degrees and Delta H degrees indicated spontaneous and endothermic adsorption process. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available