4.7 Article

Probabilistic evaluation method for corrosion risk of steel reinforcement based on concrete resistivity

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 101-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.100

Keywords

Corrosion risk; Concrete resistivity; Probabilistic prediction; Water-to-cement ratio; Chloride content; Temperature; Relative humidity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51368006, 51468004, 51668008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to overcome the disadvantages of traditional deterministic methods, a probabilistic evaluation method to assess the corrosion risk of steel reinforcement in concrete Was proposed based on the probabilistic prediction model of concrete resistivity. The influences of major influential factors including water-to-cement ratio, chloride content, ambient temperature and ambient relative humidity on concrete resistivity were investigated first. Then a probabilistic prediction model of concrete resistivity in terms of the above major influential factors was developed by using the Bayesian theory and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. Meanwhile, the evaluation criterion for corrosion risk of steel reinforcement based on concrete resistivity was proposed according to the relationship between concrete resistivity and corrosion rate of steel reinforcement. Finally, a probabilistic evaluation method for corrosion risk of steel reinforcement in concrete was developed by Means of the proposed probabilistic prediction model of concrete resistivity. Analysis results show that the proposed probabilistic evaluation method can not only identify the dominant risk of reinforcement Corrosion, but also determine the probabilities of steel reinforcement under different corrosion risk levels (e.g. negligible, low, moderate, and high), which could avoid the misjudgment of corrosion risk of steel reinforcement often encountered by the traditional deterministic evaluation methods. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available