4.7 Article

Effect of irradiation intensity and initial pollutant concentration on gas phase photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanotube arrays

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 19-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.09.004

Keywords

TiO2 nanotubes; Gas phase photocatalysis; Irradiation intensity; Light-emitting diodes; Toluene photodegradation

Funding

  1. National Centre for Research and Development
  2. National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management
  3. Gekon Program [GEKON1/03/214483/16/2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Well-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays were fabricated via one-step anodization process. The as-prepared TiO2 nanotubes were characterized by X-ray powder diffractometry (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Photocatalytic activity of obtained photocatalyst was studied in reaction of toluene degradation in the gas phase using low powered and low cost light-emitting diodes (UV LEDs) as an irradiation source. The effect of irradiation intensity and initial pollutant concentration on gas phase photoactivity of TiO2 nanotubes was analyzed. Obtained TiO2 nanotubes were smooth and vertically oriented with a length of about 1.7 +/- 0.05 mu m. The inner diameter and the wall thickness were 65 +/- 2 nm and 6 +/- 0.4 nm, respectively. The results showed that the initial toluene degradation rate increased (from 0.0062 up to 0.0567 mu mol/min) with raising initial toluene concentration (50-400 ppm), while too high dose of irradiation (about 50 mW/cm(2)) reduced photocatalytic toluene degradation rate. The best stability of TiO2 nanotubes in three subsequent irradiation cycles was observed for irradiation intensity of 38 mW/cm(2). Moreover, it was found that photocatalytic toluene degradation over TiO2 nanotubes showed first order kinetic behavior. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available