4.7 Article

Distinct roles for TET family proteins in regulating human erythropoiesis

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 129, Issue 14, Pages 2002-2012

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-736587

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK100810, DK26263]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [81530005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ten-eleven translocation (TET) family of proteins plays important roles in a wide range of biological processes by oxidizing 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. However, their function in erythropoiesis has remained unclear. We show here that TET2 and TET3 but not TET1 are expressed in human erythroid cells, and we explore the role of these proteins in erythropoiesis. Knockdown experiments revealed that TET2 and TET3 have different functions. Suppression of TET3 expression in human CD34 1 cells markedly impaired terminal erythroid differentiation, as reflected by increased apoptosis, the generation of bi/multinucleated polychromatic/orthochromatic erythroblasts, and impaired enucleation, although without effect on erythroid progenitors. In marked contrast, TET2 knockdown led to hyper-proliferation and impaired differentiation of erythroid progenitors. Surprisingly, knockdown of neither TET2 nor TET3 affected global levels of 5mC. Thus, our findings have identified distinct roles for TET2 and TET3 in human erythropoiesis, and provide new insights into their role in regulating human erythroid differentiation at distinct stages of development. Moreover, because knockdown of TET2 recapitulates certain features of erythroid development defects characteristic of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), and the TET2 genemutation is one of the most common mutations in MDS, our findings may be relevant for improved understanding of dyserythropoiesis of MDS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available