4.7 Article

Optimal payment scheme when the supplier's quality level and cost are unknown

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 245, Issue 3, Pages 731-742

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.033

Keywords

Deferred payment; Rental contract; Quality; Substitutable; Complementary

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71161008, 71271059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When procuring a product from a supplier, a buyer faces the problem of designing a payment scheme to screen the supplier's quality level and cost. We explore an instalment payment (contract) consisting of an initial payment to the supplier as soon as the product is put in use, followed by a deferred payment that is contingent upon the product in normal operation within a certain period. We find that when the high quality supplier has a higher cost than the low quality supplier, and the suppliers' financing costs are lower than a certain threshold, the optimal instalment payment has two options: an initial-payment-only option preferred by the low quality supplier and a deferred-payment-only option preferred by the high quality supplier; otherwise, the optimal contract degenerates into an initial-payment-only option. Thus, our research complements past work on moral hazard where no initial payment is proposed. Moreover, we show that the buyer has an incentive to assist with the supplier's financing. Finally, we compare the instalment payment with the rental contract and show that when the supplier's financing cost is low or the quality difference among different supplier types is small, the rental contract is more likely to be preferred by the buyer than the instalment payment. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. and Association of European Operational Research Societies (EURO) within the International Federation of Operational Research Societies (IFORS). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available