4.5 Article

Sperm storage by males causes changes in sperm phenotype and influences the reproductive fitness of males and their sons

Journal

EVOLUTION LETTERS
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 16-25

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/evl3.2

Keywords

Epigenetics; male sperm storage; paternal effects; sperm ageing; sperm competition; sperm velocity

Funding

  1. Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme [272613]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies suggest that environmentally induced effects on sperm phenotype can influence offspring phenotype beyond the dassic Mendelian inheritance mechanism. However, establishing whether such effects are conveyed purely through ejaculates, independently of maternal environmental effects, remains a significant challenge. Here, we assess whether environmentally induced effects on sperm phenotype affects male reproductive success and offspring fitness. We experimentally manipulated the duration of sperm storage by males, and thus sperm age, in the internally fertilizing fish Poecilia reticulate. We first confirm that sperm ageing influences sperm quality and consequently males reproductive success. Specifically, we show that aged sperm exhibit impaired velocity and are competitively inferior to fresh sperm when ejaculates compete to fertilize eggs. We then used homospermic (noncompetitive) artificial insemination to inseminate females with old or fresh sperm and found that male offspring arising from fertilizations by experimentally aged sperm suffered consistently impaired sperm quality when just sexually mature (four months old) and subsequently as adults (13 months old). Although we have yet to determine whether these effects have a genetic or epigenetic basis, our analyses provide evidence that environmentally induced variation in sperm phenotype constitutes an important source of variation in male reproductive fitness that has far reaching implications for offspring fitness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available