4.7 Article

Fatalities at wind turbines may threaten population viability of a migratory bat

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 209, Issue -, Pages 172-177

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.023

Keywords

Expert elicitation; hoary bat; Lasiurus cinereus; population viability; wind energy

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB-1115895/1336390]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1336290] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [1336290] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large numbers of migratory bats are killed every year at wind energy facilities. However, population-level impacts are unknown as we lack basic demographic information about these species. We investigated whether fatalities at wind turbines could impact population viability of migratory bats, focusing on the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), the species most frequently killed by turbines in North America. Using expert elicitation and population projection models, we show that mortality from wind turbines may drastically reduce population size and increase the risk of extinction. For example, the hoary bat population could decline by as much as 90% in the next 50 years if the initial population size is near 2.5 million bats and annual population growth rate is similar to rates estimated for other bat species (lambda = 1.01). Our results suggest that wind energy development may pose a substantial threat to migratory bats in North America. If viable populations are to be sustained, conservation measures to reduce mortality from turbine collisions likely need to be initiated soon. Our findings inform policy decisions regarding preventing or mitigating impacts of energy infrastructure development on wildlife. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available