Journal
BRAIN STIMULATION
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 588-595Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.001
Keywords
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Theta burst stimulation; Motor evoked potential; Variability; Motor cortex
Categories
Funding
- NHMRC-ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship [1102272]
- NHMRC Biomedical Training Fellowship [GNT1088295]
- Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H01658, 16H01605, 15K19476] Funding Source: KAKEN
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1102272] Funding Source: NHMRC
- Medical Research Council [MR/P006671/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- MRC [MR/P006671/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for both probing human neuroplasticity and the induction of functionally relevant neuroplastic change has received significant interest. However, at present the utility of NIBS is limited due to high response variability. One reason for this response variability is that NIBS targets a diffuse cortical population and the net outcome to stimulation depends on the relative levels of excitability in each population. There is evidence that the relative excitability of complex oligosynaptic circuits (late I-wave circuits) as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is useful in predicting NIBS response. Objective: Here we examined whether an additional marker of cortical excitability, MEP amplitude variability, could provide additional insights into response variability following application of the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) NIBS protocol. Additionally we investigated whether I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Methods: Thirty-four healthy subjects (15 male, aged 18-35 years) participated in two experiments. Experiment 1 investigated baseline MEP variability and cTBS response. Experiment 2 determined if I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Results: Data show that both baseline MEP variability and late I-wave recruitment are associated with cTBS response, but were independent of each other; together, these variables predict 31% of the variability in cTBS response. Conclusions: This study provides insight into the physiological mechanisms underpinning NIBS plasticity responses and may facilitate development of more reliable NIBS protocols. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available