4.7 Article

Urban parks: Visitors' perceptions versus spatial indicators

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 233-244

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.012

Keywords

Urban park; Urban green space; Subjective interpretation of the physical; environment; Objective; spatial indicators; Perceived quality of life; GIS

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the Doctoral College GlScience at the University of Salzburg [DK W 1237-N23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban green spaces and their role in the quality of life of residents have been studied across multiple disciplines, based on empirical measurements or qualitative studies - however, the relation, and its strength, between spatial indicators of urban green spaces and visitors' perceptions of green spaces are less known. Addressing this knowledge deficit, the present research uses a Geographical Information System (GIS) to link subjective evaluations of the physical environment and objective spatial indicators, to examine the correlation between the perceived and objective characteristics of five urban parks in the city of Szeged, Hungary. A questionnaire survey was used to collect residents' subjective perceptions of the parks, while objective - which is to say measurable and mappable - spatially explicit indicators of the respective green spaces were calculated using GIS. The subjective evaluations of the parks were matched to the objective indicators using a multiple regression analysis. The statistical analysis yielded two moderate and two minor correlations between the human perceptions of the investigated green spaces and the nine objective environmental indicators examined. These results showed that subjective evaluations and objective data reveal different aspects of the same reality. Therefore, the recommendations from this study are to collectively use human perceptions and objective environmental indicators, both of which are fundamental for adequately capturing the role of urban green spaces in quality of life. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available