Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 647-655Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.016
Keywords
Decision making; Delay; Integration; Empirical research; Performance measures; Prefabricated building elements; Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK); Project management success; Risk management theory; Stakeholder communication; Workflow variance
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Hybrid infrastructure projects are defined as triads of on-site/coordination/off-site project dimensions. Interaction of uncertainties in such settings result in deviations from project objectives by causing time and cost overruns, safety issues, quality deficiencies, technical problems, and lack of client satisfaction. To address these, a holistic approach in identifying and analyzing risks in hybrid (multi-dimensional) projects is proposed. Towards this aim, three research hypotheses are developed and tested using data from seven projects in Melbourne, Perth and Adelaide, Australia. Practical implications of triadic risk analysis in hybrid infrastructure projects suggest executives and managers to put more emphasis on risks associated with coordination of on-site and off-site project dimensions. This approach significantly decreases the chance of deviations from project objectives. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available