4.8 Article

Sulfur Vapor-Infiltrated 3D Carbon Nanotube Foam for Binder-Free High Areal Capacity Lithium-Sulfur Battery Composite Cathodes

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 4877-4884

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01437

Keywords

lithium-sulfur batteries; high areal capacity; high areal loading; cathode; carbon nanotubes; capillary force; high-energy density

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1400424]
  2. Vanderbilt start-up funds
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [1445197]
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1400424] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, we demonstrate a strategy to produce high areal loading and areal capacity sulfur cathodes by using vapor phase infiltration of low-density carbon nanotube (CNT) foams preformed by solution processing and freeze-drying. Vapor-phase capillary infiltration of sulfur into preformed and binder-free low density CNT foams leads to a mass loading of, similar to 79 wt % arising from interior filling and coating of CNTs with sulfur while preserving conductive CNT CNT junctions that sustain electrical accessibility through the thick foam. Sulfur cathodes are then produced by mechanically compressing these foams into dense composites (rho > 0.2 g/cm(3)), revealing specific capacity of 1039 mAh/gs at 0.1 C, high sulfur areal loading of 19.1 mg/cm(2), and high areal capacity of 19.3 mAh/cm(2). This work highlights a technique broadly adaptable to a diverse group of nanostructured building blocks where preformed low-density materials can be vapor infiltrated with sulfur, mechanically compressed, and exhibit simultaneous high areal and gravimetric storage properties. This provides a route for scalable, low-cost, and high-energy density sulfur cathodes based on conventional solid electrode processing routes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available