4.5 Article

The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 3177-3189

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2838

Keywords

benign environment hypothesis; bet-hedging; environmental predictability; offspring fitness; optimal egg size; phenotypic diversification; reproductive trade-off; sexually antagonistic selection; tortoise

Funding

  1. California Energy Commission [500-09-020]
  2. Public Interest Energy Research Program
  3. California Desert District Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
  4. Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office of BLM
  5. Joshua Tree National Park
  6. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
  7. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation's Partnerships for Wildlife program
  8. NSF [EF-1241848]
  9. Emerging Frontiers
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [1241848] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet-hedging theories in two North American desert-dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable climate spaces, respectively. Observed patterns in both species differed from the predictions of OES in several ways. Mean egg size increased with maternal body size in both species. Mean egg size was inversely related to clutch order in G. agassizii, a strategy more consistent with the within-generation hypothesis arising out of bet-hedging theory or a constraint in egg investment due to resource availability, and contrary to theories of density dependence, which posit that increasing hatchling competition from later season clutches should drive selection for larger eggs. We provide empirical evidence that one species, G. agassizii, employs a bet-hedging strategy that is a combination of two different bet-hedging hypotheses. Additionally, we found some evidence for G. morafkai employing a conservative bet-hedging strategy. (e.g., lack of intra- and interclutch variation in egg size relative to body size). Our novel adaptive hypothesis suggests the possibility that natural selection favors smaller offspring in late-season clutches because they experience a more benign environment or less energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., winter) than early clutch progeny, that emerge under harsher and more energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., summer). We also discuss alternative hypotheses of sexually antagonistic selection, which arise from the trade-offs of son versus daughter production that might have different optima depending on clutch order and variation in temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) among clutches. Resolution of these hypotheses will require long-term data on fitness of sons versus daughters as a function of incubation environment, data as yet unavailable for any species with TSD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available