4.5 Article

Nitrogen uptake and transfer in a soybean/maize intercropping system in the karst region of southwest China

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 7, Issue 20, Pages 8419-8426

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3295

Keywords

crop nutrition; isotopic tracing; karst soil; nitrogen transfer; nitrogen uptake; soybean; maize intercropping

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0502505]
  2. State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources [SKL201403]
  3. Guangxi Science and Technology Development Plan [GKG1598016-2]
  4. National Science and Technology Support Plan [2015BAD06B04]
  5. Youth Innovation Team Project of ISA, CAS [2017QNCXTD_XXL]
  6. Western Light Program of Talent Cultivation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  7. Guangxi Provincial Program of Distinguished Expert in China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen (N) deficiency occurs in over 80% of karst soil of southwest China, which restricts regional agricultural production. To test whether N fixed by legumes becomes available to nonfixing companion species, N fluxes between soybean and maize under no, partial, and total restriction of root contact were measured on a karst site in southwest China. N content and its transfer between soybean and maize intercrops were explored in a 2-year plot experiment, with N movement between crops monitored using N-15 isotopes. Mesh barrier (30m) and no restrictions barrier root separation increased N uptake of maize by 1.28%-3.45% and 3.2%-3.45%, respectively. N uptake by soybean with no restrictions root separation was 1.23 and 1.56 times higher than that by mesh and solid barriers, respectively. In the unrestricted root condition, N transfer from soybean to maize in no restrictions barrier was 2.34-3.02mg higher than that of mesh barrier. Therefore, it was implied that soybean/maize intercropping could improve N uptake and transfer efficiently in the karst region of southwest China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available