4.7 Article

Generative adversarial networks recover features in astrophysical images of galaxies beyond the deconvolution limit

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 467, Issue 1, Pages L110-L114

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx008

Keywords

methods: data analysis; techniques: image processing; galaxies: general

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [PP00P2_138979, PP00P2_166159]
  2. ETH Zurich Department of Physics
  3. Microsoft Azure for Research award programme
  4. ETH Zurich Department of Computer Science
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P2_138979, PP00P2_166159] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations of astrophysical objects such as galaxies are limited by various sources of random and systematic noise from the sky background, the optical system of the telescope and the detector used to record the data. Conventional deconvolution techniques are limited in their ability to recover features in imaging data by the Shannon-Nyquist sampling theorem. Here, we train a generative adversarial network (GAN) on a sample of 4550 images of nearby galaxies at 0.01 < z < 0.02 from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and conduct 10x cross-validation to evaluate the results. We present a method using a GAN trained on galaxy images that can recover features from artificially degraded images with worse seeing and higher noise than the original with a performance that far exceeds simple deconvolution. The ability to better recover detailed features such as galaxy morphology from low signal to noise and low angular resolution imaging data significantly increases our ability to study existing data sets of astrophysical objects as well as future observations with observatories such as the Large Synoptic Sky Telescope (LSST) and the Hubble and James Webb space telescopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available