4.5 Article

Evaluating hybridization capture with RAD probes as a tool for museum genomics with historical bird specimens

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 7, Issue 13, Pages 4755-4767

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3065

Keywords

ancient DNA; hyRAD; museum genomics; RADseq; sequence capture

Funding

  1. Army Research Office
  2. NDSEG Fellowship
  3. National Science Foundation [1601515]
  4. Washington Research Foundation-Hall Fellowships
  5. Society of Systematic Biology
  6. Graduate Student Research Award
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1601515] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [1601515] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laboratory techniques for high-throughput sequencing have enhanced our ability to generate DNA sequence data from millions of natural history specimens collected prior to the molecular era, but remain poorly tested at shallower evolutionary time scales. Hybridization capture using restriction site-associated DNA probes (hyRAD) is a recently developed method for population genomics with museum specimens. The hyRAD method employs fragments produced in a restriction site-associated double digestion as the basis for probes that capture orthologous loci in samples of interest. While promising in that it does not require a reference genome, hyRAD has yet to be applied across study systems in independent laboratories. Here, we provide an independent assessment of the effectiveness of hyRAD on both fresh avian tissue and dried tissue from museum specimens up to 140 years old and investigate how variable quantities of input DNA affect sequencing, assembly, and population genetic inference. We present a modified bench protocol and bioinformatics pipeline, including three steps for detection and removal of microbial and mitochondrial DNA contaminants. We confirm that hyRAD is an effective tool for sampling thousands of orthologous SNPs from historic museum specimens to describe phylogeographic patterns. We find that modern DNA performs significantly better than historical DNA better during sequencing but that assembly performance is largely equivalent. We also find that the quantity of input DNA predicts %GC content of assembled contiguous sequences, suggesting PCR bias. We caution against sampling schemes that include taxonomic or geographic autocorrelation across modern and historic samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available