4.7 Article

Impact of different levels of geographical disaggregation of wind and PV electricity generation in large energy system models: A case study for Austria

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 183-198

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.12.020

Keywords

Photovoltaic energy; Wind energy; Optimization energy system model; Spatially-explicit

Funding

  1. Whole Systems Energy Modelling Consortium (Who1eSEM) [EP/K039326/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039326/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/K039326/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper assesses how different levels of geographical disaggregation of wind and photovoltaic energy resources could affect the outcomes of an energy system model by 2020 and 2050. Energy system models used for policy making typically have high technology detail but little spatial detail. However, the generation potential and integration costs of variable renewable energy sources and their time profile of production depend on geographic characteristics and infrastructure in place. For a case study for Austria we generate spatially highly resolved synthetic time series for potential production locations of wind power and PV. There are regional differences in the costs for wind turbines but not for PV. However, they are smaller than the cost reductions induced by technological learning from one modelled decade to the other. The wind availability shows significant regional differences where mainly the differences for summer days and winter nights are important. The solar availability for PV installations is more homogenous. We introduce these wind and PV data into the energy system model JRC-EU-TIMES with different levels of regional disaggregation. Results show that up to the point that the maximum potential is reached disaggregating wind regions significantly affects results causing lower electricity generation from wind and PV. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available