4.7 Review

Systematic review with meta-analysis: use of 5-aminosalicylates and risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 1179-1192

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.14023

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Abbvie
  2. Amgen
  3. Biogaran
  4. Biogen
  5. Boerhinger-Ingelheim
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Celgene
  8. Celltrion
  9. Ferring
  10. Forward Pharma
  11. Genentech
  12. H.A.C. Pharma
  13. Hospira
  14. Index Pharmaceuticals
  15. Janssen
  16. Lycera
  17. Merck
  18. Lilly
  19. Mitsubishi
  20. Norgine
  21. Pfizer
  22. Pharmacosmos
  23. Pilege
  24. Samsung Bioepis
  25. Sandoz
  26. Takeda
  27. Therakos
  28. Tillots
  29. UCB Pharma
  30. Vifor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe relationship of 5-aminosalicylates' use with the risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been the focus of a growing body of research. AimTo investigate this association through an updated meta-analysis of observational studies. MethodsPubMed, Scopus and major conference proceedings were searched up to December 2016. The identified studies were evaluated for publication bias and heterogeneity. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates were calculated using random-effect models. Detailed subgroup analyses were performed. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. ResultsThirty-one independent observational studies including 2137 cases of colorectal neoplasia (of which 76% were cancers) were incorporated. Between-study heterogeneity was moderate, while strong suspicion of small-study effects was raised. The overall analysis revealed a protective association between 5-aminosalicylates' use and colorectal neoplasia (RR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.45-0.71). When the analysis was stratified according to study design and setting, the association was significant in cohort (RR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-0.99; n=10) and case-control studies (RR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.70; n=21), population-based (RR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.52-0.94; n=12) and hospital-based studies (RR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.34-0.61; n=19). Exposure to 5-aminosalicylates was protective against cancer (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.45-0.74) and dysplasia (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.84). The reduction in colorectal neoplasia risk was strong in ulcerative colitis (RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.64), but nonsignificant in Crohn's disease (RR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.43-1.33). Mesalazine (mesalamine) use was protective (RR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.51-0.94) with evidence of a dose-effect. The effect of sulfasalazine was marginally nonsignificant (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.51-1.01). ConclusionsOur findings support a potential chemopreventive role of 5-aminosalicylates in IBD. Further, high-quality prospective research is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available