4.6 Review

Current understanding of bleeding with ibrutinib use: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BLOOD ADVANCES
Volume 1, Issue 12, Pages 772-778

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016001883

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. McMaster University
  2. Hamilton Health Sciences RFA Strategic Initiative Program
  3. Department of Oncology, McMaster University
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ibrutinib therapy was associated with an increased risk of bleeding in previous trials. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials including patients treated with ibrutinib, the relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of overall bleeding was significantly higher in ibrutinib recipients (2.72 [1.62-6.58]), but major bleeding did not show a significant difference (1.66 [0.96-2.85]). The incidences (95% CI) of major bleeding and any bleeding were 3.0 (2.3-3.7) and 20.8 (19.1-22.1) per 100 patient-years, respectively. This analysis is limited by reporting bias from variable ascertainment of bleeding and lack of allocation concealment in some studies and differing exposures between groups, leading to potential overestimation of event rates in the ibrutinib group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available