4.1 Article

Multiple resistance to thifensulfuron-methyl and fomesafen in redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) from China

Journal

CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages 311-317

Publisher

INST INVESTIGACIONES AGROPECUARIAS
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392017000400311

Keywords

Acetolactate synthase; gene mutation; protoporphyrinogen oxidase; multiple resistance

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest [201303031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) is a troublesome weed infesting soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) productions in China. One redroot pigweed population, collected from Heilongjiang (HLJ) Province, China, was suspected to be resistant to thifensulfuron-methyl and fomesafen. The other one redroot pigweed population, collected from Shandong (SD) Province, was susceptible. The study aimed to characterize the level of thifensulfuron-methyl and fomesafen resistance using HLJ population and identify the potential resistance mechanisms to thifensulfuron-methyl. The sensitivity to other herbicides with and without the same target site was also evaluated. Acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene sequencing revealed that Trp(574)Leu or Ala(205)Val amino acid substitution were present in the HLJ population. Whole-plant herbicide bioassays showed that, compared with SD population, HLJ population displayed high level of resistance to thifensulfuron-methyl and moderate resistance to fomesafen. The 50% growth reduction (GR(50)) value of thifensulfuron-methyl with malathion pretreatment was reduced by 23%, suggesting that both target-site resistance and non-target-site resistance mechanisms were present in thifensulfuron-methyl resistance of redroot pigweed. Cross-resistant patterns showed that the HLJ population evolved resistance to pyrithiobac-sodium, pyroxsulam, imazethapyr and fluoroglycofen, but susceptible to bentazone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available