4.5 Article

Development and validation of the Chinese Version of Spiritual Interests Related Illness Tool for patients with cancer in Taiwan

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 589-594

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.03.005

Keywords

Spiritual needs; Content validity; Construct validity; Internal consistency reliability; Patients with cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to develop and validate the Chinese Version of Spiritual Interests Related Illness Tool (C-SpIRIT) for patients with cancer in Taiwan. Methods: Translation, adaptation, and content validation were performed based on the 44-item Spiritual Interests Related Illness Tool. The psychometric validation was conducted based on 260 participants who were recruited from the oncology outpatient clinic of a medical center in southern Taiwan. The data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson's correlations. Results: Five subscales (related to beliefs/religion, positive attitudes toward life, love to/from others, seeking for the meaning of life, and peaceful mind) were extracted from an exploratory factor analysis. The five subscales (with 21 items) accounted for 50.43% of the variance. The evidence based on concurrent validity was supported by a significant correlation (r = 0.95) between the 33-itm C-SpIRIT and the 21-item C-SpIRIT. Cronbach's a values (0.73-0.88) demonstrated internal item consistency of the CSpIRIT. Conclusions: This preliminary 21-item and 5-factor constructed C-SpIRIT demonstrated a valid and reliable instrument to assess the spiritual needs of patients with cancer in Taiwan. In addition, it is a handy tool for oncology nursing practitioners to gage their patients' spiritual needs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available