4.8 Article

Peptide-Based Scaffolds Support Human Cortical Progenitor Graft Integration to Reduce Atrophy and Promote Functional Repair in a Model of Stroke

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1964-1977

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.069

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council Australia [APP1122974]
  2. Australian Research Council [130103131]
  3. CASS Foundation, Australia
  4. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support grant
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postgraduate Scholarship Doctoral award
  6. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship
  7. Senior Medical Research Fellowship
  8. Australian Microscopy and Microanalysis Research Facility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cell transplants offer significant hope for brain repair following ischemic damage. Pre-clinical work suggests that therapeutic mechanisms may be multi-faceted, incorporating bone-fide circuit reconstruction by transplanted neurons, but also protection/regeneration of host circuitry. Here, we engineered hydrogel scaffolds to form bio-bridges'' within the necrotic lesion cavity, providing physical and trophic support to transplanted human embryonic stem cell-derived cortical progenitors, as well as residual host neurons. Scaffolds were fabricated by the self-assembly of peptides for a laminin-derived epitope (IKVAV), thereby mimicking the brain's major extracellular protein. Following focal ischemia in rats, scaffold-supported cell transplants induced progressive motor improvements over 9 months, compared to cell-or scaffold-only implants. These grafts were larger, exhibited greater neuronal differentiation, and showed enhanced electrophysiological properties reflective of mature, integrated neurons. Varying graft timing post-injury enabled us to attribute repair to both neuroprotection and circuit replacement. These findings highlight strategies to improve the efficiency of stem cell grafts for brain repair.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available