4.8 Article

Quiescence Exit of Tert+ Stem Cells by Wnt/β-Catenin Is Indispensable for Intestinal Regeneration

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 2571-2584

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.118

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP140563]
  2. NIH [CA193297-01, CA098258]
  3. Department of Defense [CA140572]
  4. Duncan Family Institute for Cancer Prevention and Risk Assessment grant [IRG-08-061-01]
  5. Center for Stem Cell and Developmental Biology Transformative grant (MD Anderson Cancer Center)
  6. Institutional Research grant (MD Anderson Cancer Center)
  7. New Faculty Award [CA016672]
  8. Metastasis Research Center grant (MD Anderson Cancer Center)
  9. MD Anderson Cancer Center [CA016672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fine control of stem cell maintenance and activation is crucial for tissue homeostasis and regeneration. However, the mechanism of quiescence exit of Tert(+) intestinal stem cells (ISCs) remains unknown. Employing a Tert knockin (Tert(TCE/+)) mouse model, we found that Tert(+) cells are long-term label-retaining self-renewing cells, which are partially distinguished from the previously identified +4 ISCs. Tert(+) cells become mitotic upon irradiation (IR) injury. Conditional ablation of Tert(+) cells impairs IR-induced intestinal regeneration but not intestinal homeostasis. Upon IR injury, Wnt signaling is specifically activated in Tert(+) cells via the ROS-HIFs-transactivated Wnt2b signaling axis. Importantly, conditional knockout of beta-catenin/Ctnnb1 in Tert(+) cells undermines IR-induced quiescence exit of Tert(+) cells, which subsequently impedes intestinal regeneration. Our results that Wnt-signaling-induced activation of Tert(+) ISCs is indispensable for intestinal regeneration unveil the underlying mechanism for how Tert(+) stem cells undergo quiescence exit upon tissue injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available