4.5 Article

Inhibition in motor imagery: a novel action mode switching paradigm

Journal

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 459-466

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1095-5

Keywords

Motor imagery; Inhibition; Trial sequence effects; Global inhibition; Specific inhibition

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24940-B25]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 24940] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24940] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motor imagery requires that actual movements are prevented (i.e., inhibited) from execution. To investigate at what level inhibition takes place in motor imagery, we developed a novel action mode switching paradigm. Participants imagined (indicating only start and end) and executed movements from start buttons to target buttons, and we analyzed trial sequence effects. Trial sequences depended on current action mode (imagination or execution), previous action mode (pure blocks/same mode, mixed blocks/same mode, or mixed blocks/other mode), and movement sequence (action repetition, hand repetition, or hand alternation). Results provided evidence for global inhibition (indicated by switch benefits in execution-imagination (E-I)-sequences in comparison to I-I-sequences), effector-specific inhibition (indicated by hand repetition costs after an imagination trial), and target inhibition (indicated by target repetition benefits in I-I-sequences). No evidence for subthreshold motor activation or action-specific inhibition (inhibition of the movement of an effector to a specific target) was obtained. Two (global inhibition and effector-specific inhibition) of the three observed mechanisms are active inhibition mechanisms. In conclusion, motor imagery is not simply a weaker form of execution, which often is implied in views focusing on similarities between imagination and execution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available