4.6 Article

Infiltration of effector regulatory T cells predicts poor prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified

Journal

BLOOD ADVANCES
Volume 1, Issue 8, Pages 486-493

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016000885

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Osaka Community Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) specifically express the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) and contribute to tumor progression. FOXP3-positive cells have been recently proven to be heterogeneous in phenotype and function, including effector Tregs (eTregs), naive Tregs, and non-Tregs, which harbor no suppressive function. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the true Treg (eTreg) population, rather than the entire FOXP3 population, with regards to their effect on tumor immunity. In particular, in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS), FOXP3-positive cells correlated with a better prognosis. The present study sought to evaluate the relationship between the prognosis of DLBCL, NOS patients and the infiltration of true Tregs by employing dual immunostaining with FOXP3 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4). CTLA-4 is a negative immunomodulatory known to be expressed by eTregs, but not by nonTregs. Lymph nodes from 82 nodal DLBCL, NOS patients were stained with anti-FOXP3 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. A high infiltration of FOXP3-positive cells was associated with a significantly better prognosis than patients with low levels of FOXP3-positive cells for overall survival (OS) (P = .0233). In sharp contrast, a high infiltration of FOXP3/CTLA-4 double-positive cells was significantly associated with a poor prognosis than patients with low levels of FOXP3/CTLA-4 double-positive cells for OS (P = .0121) and progression-free survival (P = .0171), independent of the international prognostic index. FOXP3/CTLA-4 double-positive cells, eTregs, play an important role in DLBCL, NOS progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available