4.4 Article

A polymorphism in mir-34b/c as a potential biomarker for early onset of hereditary retinoblastoma

Journal

CANCER BIOMARKERS
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 313-317

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-160248

Keywords

Retinoblastoma; mir-34b/c; rs4938723; age at diagnosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [486599/2012-4]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E26/110.535/2012]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) PhD grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma (RB) is a malignant pediatric tumor and, mainly because of late diagnosis, most patients undergo enucleation. The tumor almost always initiates by two inactivation events at the RB1 gene. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in p53 pathway have been found to represent genetic modifiers of RB. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a SNP (rs4938723T > C) in mir-34b/c gene, a key effector of p53, could influence RB risk and patients' age of onset. METHODS: mir-34b/c rs4938723T > C was sequenced in 130 RB patients and in 105 control individuals. Statistical analysis consisted of chi(2) tests or Fisher's exact, odds ratios (ORs) and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The presence of the C allele did not change the risk for retinoblastoma. However, in hereditary RB patients, the mean age at diagnosis is much lower (1.4 +/- 1.4 months) among CC carriers than when it is compared to TT genotype (13.8 +/- 6.4, p = 0.001). Besides, hereditary RB patients with CC genotype are around 4 times more likely to present retinoblastoma under the age of 3 months (OR = 4.44; IC: 2.50-7.90; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The C allele together with a germ-line RB1 gene mutation may speed retinoblastoma onset which suggests that mir-34b/c rs4938723T > C may represent a candidate biomarker for hereditary RB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available