4.3 Article

A comprehensive profiling of supragingival bacterial composition in Chinese twin children and their mothers

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10482-017-0828-4

Keywords

Twin; Oral microbiome; 454 pyrosequencing

Categories

Funding

  1. Pre-project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973 Program) [2011CB512108]
  2. Research project of Sichuan Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission [130179]
  3. Research Project of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital [2015bs14, 30305030600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the factors influencing the oral microbiome, 16 twin pairs and their mothers were enrolled in this study. There were 7 monozygotic (MZ) twins and 9 dizygotic (DZ) twins, with an average age of 6.18 +/- 3.5. Supragingival plaques and caries tissues were collected and the 16S rDNA was analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing. A total of 18 phyla and 179 genuses were found. Caries children harbored a higher portion of Actinobacteria than caries-free ones, and one lineage was found to be less abundant in the caries tissues compared to the supragingival plaque at each level from the phylum down to the genus level, which was Fusobacteria at Phylum, Fusobacteriia at Class, Fusobacteriales at Order, Leptotrichiaceae at Family and Leptotrichia at genus level. The adults harbored a significantly higher portion of Treponema, which may be related to adult periodontitis. The phylogenetic tree showed that there was a high similarity of oral microbiota within co-twins, but no significant difference was detected between MZ and DZ twins. Also, the similarity level of primary dentition children to their mother was significantly higher than that of mixed dentition children, suggesting that environmental factors may have a stronger impact than the genetic factors on the constitution of the oral microbiome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available