4.3 Article

After the Bell and into the Night: The Link between Delinquency and Traditional, Cyber-, and Dual-Bullying Victimization

Journal

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 409-441

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022427816683515

Keywords

bullying; cyberbullying; cyber victimization; juvenile delinquency

Funding

  1. National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice [2006-JV-FX-0011]
  2. School District of Philadelphia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This study examines the effects of traditional bullying, cyberbullying, and dual-bullying victimization on subsequent delinquent outcomes. Method: Data come from a longitudinal sample of middle school students (N = 3,271) as part of the evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT) program. A hybrid random effects model is used to estimate the between- and within-individual effects of traditional, cyber-, and dual-bullying victimization while controlling for other predictors of delinquency. Outcomes include general delinquency, violent and nonviolent delinquency, and substance use. Results: The findings demonstrate that those who are cyberbullied exhibit a higher propensity for substance use and nonviolent delinquency compared to those who are traditionally bullied. Changes in dual victimization within respondents over time are most strongly related to general delinquency. With one exception, the effect of traditional bullying victimization remained weakest in all of the models. Conclusions: This study finds evidence that victims of cyberbullying may be more likely to engage in delinquent and deviant behavior compared to victims of traditional bullying. Criminologists and antibullying prevention efforts should consider the broader role of cyberbullying victimization in the developmental processes of adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available