4.7 Article

Genome Editing in hPSCs Reveals GATA6 Haploinsufficiency and a Genetic Interaction with GATA4 in Human Pancreatic Development

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 675-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.01.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. New York State Stem Cell Science Program (NYSTEM) [C029567, C029156]
  2. NIH/NIDDK [R01DK096239, DP3DK111907, DP2DK098093-01]
  3. Tri-Institutional Stem Cell Initiative [2016-004]
  4. MSKCC Cancer Center Support grant [P30 CA008748]
  5. Korean Government Scholarship Program for Study Overseas
  6. Mogam Science Scholarship Foundation
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Medical Research Fellowship
  8. NYSTEM postdoctoral fellowship from the Center for Stem Cell Biology of the Sloan Kettering Institute [C026879]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human disease phenotypes associated with haploinsufficient gene requirements are often not recapitulated well in animal models. Here, we have investigated the association between human GATA6 haploinsufficiency and a wide range of clinical phenotypes that include neonatal and adult-onset diabetes using CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas9-mediated genome editing coupled with human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) directed differentiation. We found that loss of one GATA6 allele specifically affects the differentiation of human pancreatic progenitors from the early PDX1+ stage to the more mature PDX1+NKX6.1+ stage, leading to impaired formation of glucose-responsive beta-like cells. In addition to this GATA6 haploinsufficiency, we also identified dosage-sensitive requirements for GATA6 and GATA4 in the formation of both definitive endoderm and pancreatic progenitor cells. Our work expands the application of hPSCs from studying the impact of individual gene loci to investigation of multigenic human traits, and it establishes an approach for identifying genetic modifiers of human disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available