4.4 Article

Cardiovascular Safety of Droxidopa in Patients With Symptomatic Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages 1111-1115

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.066

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Lundbeck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The norepinephrine prodrug droxidopa improves symptoms of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, a condition that is associated with diseases of neurogenic autonomic failure (e.g., Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy, pure autonomic failure). These conditions are more prevalent in older patients who also have cardiovascular co-morbidities. Hence, we evaluated the cardiovascular safety of droxidopa in patients with symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension who participated in randomized controlled studies (short-term studies of 1 to 2 weeks and an intermediate 8- to 10-week study) and long-term open-label studies. Rates of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) for patients treated with droxidopa were 4.4% in the intermediate study and 10.8% in the long-term open-label studies. Adjusting for exposure time, cardiovascular AE rates were 0.30 events/patient-year in the short-term and intermediate studies and 0.15 events/patient-year in the long-term open label studies. The incidence of treatment discontinuation due to blood pressure related events was approximately 2.5%. Among patients with a history of cardiac disorders at baseline, the rates of cardiovascular-related and blood pressure related AEs were nominally higher with droxidopa compared to placebo. Most of these events were minor atrial arrhythmias; none were major adverse cardiovascular events or deaths. In conclusion, small increases in cardiovascular AEs were observed with droxidopa compared to placebo; this was most evident in patients with preexisting cardiac disorders. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available