4.6 Article

Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013318

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research [AC-2012-01]
  2. Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates [PCRCA_08_01]
  3. Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London
  4. PRISMS team (NIHR HSDR Grant) [11/1014/04]
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Bart's Health NHS Trust
  6. Farr Institute
  7. Asthma UK [AUK-AC-2012-01] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Chief Scientist Office [PCRCA/08/01] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [11/1014/04] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Implementation studies are often poorly reported and indexed, reducing their potential to inform the provision of healthcare services. The Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) initiative aims to develop guidelines for transparent and accurate reporting of implementation studies. Methods: An international working group developed the StaRI guideline informed by a systematic literature review and e-Delphi prioritisation exercise. Following a face-to-face meeting, the checklist was developed iteratively by email discussion and critical review by international experts. Results: The 27 items of the checklist are applicable to the broad range of study designs employed in implementation science. A key concept is the dual strands, represented as 2 columns in the checklist, describing, on the one hand, the implementation strategy and, on the other, the clinical, healthcare or public health intervention being implemented. This explanation and elaboration document details each of the items, explains the rationale and provides examples of good reporting practice. Conclusions: Previously published reporting statements have been instrumental in improving reporting standards; adoption by journals and authors may achieve a similar improvement in the reporting of implementation strategies that will facilitate translation of effective interventions into routine practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available