4.8 Article

Techno-economic assessment of mobilized thermal energy storage for distributed users: A case study in China

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages 481-486

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.137

Keywords

Mobilized thermal energy storage (M-TES); Waste heat; Operating strategy; Techno-economic assessment

Funding

  1. Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy (Tianjin University), Ministry of Education of China [201604-502]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia, China [2016BS0512]
  3. Research Program of Science and Technology at Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [NJZY14164]
  4. Innovation Fund of Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology [2015QDL15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mobilized thermal energy storage (M-TES) system is a promising alternative to conventional heating systems to meet the heat demand for distributed users. This paper provided a techno-economic assessment of the M-TES system based on a case study in China. According to the analysis of the design specifications of the heating system, the suitability of matching the M-TES with existing heating systems was analyzed. The results show that the M-TES is appropriate for use with heating systems with a fan-coil unit and under-floor pipe. Containers and operating strategies for the M-TES with different transportation schemes were also designed. The maximum allowed load of the M-TES container is 39 t according to the discussion of transportation regulations on the road. The cost and income of the M-TES in the study case were estimated, and the net present value (NPV) and payback period (PBP) were also calculated. The best operating strategy is the use of 2 containers and 4 cycles of container transportation per day, with a PBP of approximately 10 years. The M-TES is applicable for middle and small-scale heat users in China. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available