4.8 Article

A bio-chemical application of N-GQDs and g-C3N4 QDs sensitized TiO2 nanopillars for the quantitative detection of pcDNA3-HBV

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 456-464

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.12.059

Keywords

TiO2 NPs/N-GQDs/g-C3N4 QDs; pcDNA3-HBV; Photoelectrochemistry

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592125]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21405059, 81600469, 21575050, 21505051]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province, China [2015GGH301001]
  4. Technology Research Project of Shandong Provincial Education Department [J15LC07]
  5. Graduate Innovation Foundation of University of Jinan [YCXB15004]
  6. Taishan Scholar Professorship of Shandong Province and UJN [ts20130937]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, TiO2 nanopillars (NPs)/N-doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs)/g-C3N4 QDs heterojunction efficiently suppressed the photogenerated charges recombination and improved photo-to-current conversion efficiency. The introduced N-GQDs and g-C3N4 QDs could result in more effective separation of the photogenerated charges, and thus produce a further increase of the photocurrent. TiO2 NPs/N-GQDs/g-C3N4 QDs were firstly applied as the photoactive materials for the fabrication of the biosensors, and the primers of pcDNA3-HBV were then adsorbed on the TiO2 NPs/N-GQDs/g-C3N4 QDs modified electrode under the activation of EDC/NHS. With increase of the pcDNA3-HBV concentration, the photocurrent reduced once the double helix between the primers and pcDNA3-HBV formed. The developed photoelectrochemical (PEC) biosensor showed a sensitive response to pcDNA3-HBV in a linear range of 0.01 fmol/L to 20 nmol/L with a detection limit of 0.005 fmol/L under the optimal conditions. The biosensor exhibited high sensitivity, good selectivity, good stability and reproducibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available