4.7 Article

New probe of magnetic fields in the pre-reionization epoch. II. Detectability

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.083011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. W. M. Keck Foundation Fund at the Institute for Advanced Study
  2. Schmidt Fellowship at the Institute for Advanced Study
  3. Fund for Memberships in Natural Sciences at the Institute for Advanced Study
  4. Simons Foundation
  5. U.S. Department of Energy
  6. David & Lucile Packard Foundation
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the first paper of this series, we proposed a novel method to probe large-scale intergalactic magnetic fields during the cosmic Dark Ages, using 21-cm tomography. This method relies on the effect of spin alignment of hydrogen atoms in a cosmological setting, and on the effect of magnetic precession of the atoms on the statistics of the 21-cm brightness-temperature fluctuations. In this paper, we forecast the sensitivity of future tomographic surveys to detecting magnetic fields using this method. For this purpose, we develop a minimum-variance estimator formalism to capture the characteristic anisotropy signal using the two-point statistics of the brightness-temperature fluctuations. We find that, depending on the reionization history, and subject to the control of systematics from foreground subtraction, an array of dipole antennas in a compact-grid configuration with a collecting area slightly exceeding one square kilometer can achieve a 1 sigma detection of similar to 10(-21) Gauss comoving (scaled to present-day value) within three years of observation. Using this method, tomographic 21-cm surveys could thus probe ten orders of magnitude below current cosmic microwave background constraints on primordial magnetic fields, and provide exquisite sensitivity to large-scale magnetic fields in situ at high redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available