4.5 Article

Biomass burning tracers in rural and urban ultrafine particles in Xi'an, China

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 614-618

Publisher

TURKISH NATL COMMITTEE AIR POLLUTION RES & CONTROL-TUNCAP
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.011

Keywords

Levoglucosan; Biomass burning; Ultrafine particles; Rural area; Xi'an

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271481]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the impact of biomass burning emissions on ultrafine particles (PM0.133: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 0.133 mu m), biomass burning tracers (including levoglucosan, mannonsan and K+) were measured at a rural and an urban sites in Xi'an during winter heating period. The average levoglucosan concentrations of rural and urban PM0.133 were 0.93 +/- 0.32 mu g m(-3) and 0.29 +/- 0.14 mg m(-3), respectively. Comparable PM0.133 mannosan concentrations were observed in rural samples (0.16 +/- 0.26 mu g m(-3)) and urban samples (0.17 +/- 0.10 mu g m(-3)). Higher correlation between levoglucosan and K+ was obtained for urban samples (R = 0.86) than that for rural samples (R = 0.72). The levoglucosan to K+ ratio was found to be higher for rural samples (0.77 +/- 0.39) compared to that for urban samples (0.32 +/- 0.14). Levoglucosan to mannosan ratios averaged 7.86 and 2.83 for rural and urban samples, respectively. It can be concluded that the major source of rural biomass burning was the combustion of crop residuals and softwood. The contributions of biomass burning to OC ranged from 19% to 32%, with an average of 24% for rural samples. The results provide a better understanding on the rural and urban magnitude of levoglucosan and contributions of biomass burning in Xi'an. (C) 2017 Turkish National Committee for Air Pollution Research and Control. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available