4.0 Review

Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling of Archaea Lends Insight into Diversity of Metabolic Function

Journal

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2017/9763848

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-FG02-10ER6510]
  2. NASA Grant [NNA13AA91A]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1144245]
  4. NASA [475572, NNA13AA91A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Decades of biochemical, bioinformatic, and sequencing data are currently being systematically compiled into genome-scale metabolic reconstructions (GEMs). Such reconstructions are knowledge-bases useful for engineering, modeling, and comparative analysis. Here we review the fifteen GEMs of archaeal species that have been constructed to date. They represent primarilymembers of the Euryarchaeota with three-quarters comprising representative of methanogens. Unlike other reviews on GEMs, we specially focus on archaea. We briefly review the GEM construction process and the genealogy of the archaeal models. The major insights gained during the construction of these models are then reviewed with specific focus on novel metabolic pathway predictions and growth characteristics. Metabolic pathway usage is discussed in the context of the composition of each organism's biomass and their specific energy and growth requirements. We show how the metabolic models can be used to study the evolution of metabolism in archaea. Conservation of particular metabolic pathways can be studied by comparing reactions using the genes associated with their enzymes. This demonstrates the utility of GEMs to evolutionary studies, far beyond their original purpose of metabolic modeling; however, much needs to be done before archaeal models are as extensively complete as those for bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available