4.4 Article

Synchrony in population counts predicts butterfly movement frequencies

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 375-378

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/een.12391

Keywords

Boloria eunomia; functional connectivity; habitat fragmentation; landscape permeability; long-term monitoring data; mark release recapture

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council
  2. Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS
  3. ANR
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh020002, ceh020004] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [ceh020002, ceh020004] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. Measuring functional connectivity, the ability of species to move between resource patches, is essential for conservation in fragmented landscapes. However, current methods are highly time consuming and expensive. 2. Population synchrony- the correlation in time series of counts between two long-term population monitoring sites, has been suggested as a possible proxy measure of functional connectivity. To date, population synchrony has been shown to correlate with proxies for movement frequency such as the coverage of suitable habitat types in intervening landscapes, and also least cost distances around hostile land cover types. 3. This provides tentative evidence that synchrony is directly driven by movements of the focal species, but an alternative explanation is that these land cover types affect the movement of interacting species (e.g. natural enemies of the focal species) which can also drive synchronous population dynamics. Therefore, what is needed is a test directly relating population synchrony to movement frequencies of a focal species. 4. Here we use data from a 21year mark-release-recapture study and show that population synchrony does indeed predict movements of a focal butterfly species Boloria eunomia (Esper). 5. There is growing evidence that population synchrony can be a useful conservation tool to measure functional connectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available