4.7 Article

The senescence accelerated mouse prone 8 (SAMP8): A novel murine model for cardiac aging

Journal

AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 291-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.10.006

Keywords

Aging; Senescence-accelerated prone mouse 8; Cardiac remodeling; Oxidative stress; Inflammation

Funding

  1. AHA post-doctoral fellowship [15POST25710392]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan
  3. Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools, Japan
  4. National Institutes of Health [U01 HL100397]
  5. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP150611]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because cardiovascular disease remains the major cause of mortality and morbidity world-wide, there remains a compelling need for new insights and novel therapeutic avenues. In this regard, the senescence accelerated mouse prone 8 (SAMP8) line is a particularly good model for studying the effects of aging on cardiovascular health. Accumulating evidence suggests that this model may shed light on age-associated cardiac and vascular dysfunction and disease. These animals manifest evidence of inflammation, oxidative stress and adverse cardiac remodeling that may recapitulate processes involved in human disease. Early alterations in oxidative damage promote endoplasmic reticulum stress to trigger apoptosis and cytokine production in this genetically susceptible mouse strain. Conversely, pharmacological treatments that reduce inflammation and oxidative stress improve cardiac function in these animals. Therefore, the SAMP8 mouse model provides an exciting opportunity to expand our knowledge of aging in cardiovascular disease and the potential identification of novel targets of treatment. Herein, we review the previous studies performed in SAMP8 mice that provide insight into age-related cardiovascular alterations. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available