4.7 Review

Radiolabelled Polymeric Materials for Imaging and Treatment of Cancer: Quo Vadis?

Journal

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201601115

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Virtual Institute NanoTracking [VH-VI-421]
  2. Technologie und Medizin - Multimodale Bildgebeung zur Aufklarung des in-vivo-Verhaltens von polymeren Biomaterialien' of the Helmholtz-Portfoliothema
  3. Czech Grant Foundation [16-02870S, 16-03156S]
  4. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [16-30544A, 15-25781A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owing to their tunable blood circulation time and suitable plasma stability, polymer-based nanomaterials hold a great potential for designing and utilising multifunctional nanocarriers for efficient imaging and effective treatment of cancer. When tagged with appropriate radionuclides, they may allow for specific detection (diagnosis) as well as the destruction of tumours (therapy) or even customization of materials, aiming to both diagnosis and therapy (theranostic approach). This review provides an overview of recent developments of radiolabelled polymeric nanomaterials (natural and synthetic polymers) for molecular imaging of cancer, specifically, applying nuclear techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Different approaches to radiolabel polymers are evaluated from the methodical radiochemical point of view. This includes new bifunctional chelating agents (BFCAs) for radiometals as well as novel labelling methods. Special emphasis is given to eligible strategies employed to evade the mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS) in view of efficient targeting. The discussion encompasses promising strategies currently employed as well as emerging possibilities in radionuclide-based cancer therapy. Key issues involved in the clinical translation of radiolabelled polymers and future scopes of this intriguing research field are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available