4.7 Article

Resource Competition Shapes the Response of Genetic Circuits

Journal

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 1263-1272

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00361

Keywords

genetic circuit; context dependence; modularity; resource competition; model-guided design; activation cascade

Funding

  1. AFOSR Grant [FA9550-14-1-0060]
  2. ONR Award [N000141310074]
  3. BBSRC Grant [BB/M009769/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/M009769/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M009769/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A common approach to design genetic circuits is to compose gene expression cassettes together. While appealing, this modular approach is challenged by the fact that expression of each gene depends on the availability of transcriptional/translational resources, which is in turn determined by the presence of other genes in the circuit. This raises the question of how competition for resources by different genes affects a circuits behavior. Here, we create a library of genetic activation cascades in E. coli bacteria, where we explicitly tune the resource demand by each gene. We develop a general Hill-function-based model that incorporates resource competition effects through resource demand coefficients. These coefficients lead to nonregulatory interactions among genes that reshape the circuits behavior. For the activation cascade, such interactions result in surprising biphasic or monotonically decreasing responses. Finally, we use resource demand coefficients to guide the choice of ribosome binding site and DNA copy number to restore the cascades intended monotonically increasing response. Our results demonstrate how unintended circuits behavior arises from resource competition and provide a model-guided methodology to minimize the resulting effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available