4.5 Article

High-frequency stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex decreases cellular firing in the dorsal raphe

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1219-1226

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12856

Keywords

cellular firing; depression; dorsal raphe; high-frequency stimulation; medial prefrontal cortex; rat

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP 98006, MOP 110970]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-frequency deep brain stimulation (HFS-DBS) of the subcallosal cingulate (SCC) region has been investigated as a treatment for refractory forms of depression with a similar to 50% remission rate in open label studies. However, the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS are still largely unknown. Using anaesthetized Sprague Dawley rats, we recorded neuronal spiking activity in 102 neurons of the dorsal raphe (DR) before, during and after the induction of a 5-min HFS train in the infralimbic region (IL) of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), the rodent homologue of the human SCC. The majority of DR cells (82%) significantly decreased firing rate during HFS (P<0.01, 55.7 +/- 4.5% of baseline, 35 rats). To assess whether mPFC-HFS mediates inhibition of DR cellular firing by stimulating local GABAergic interneurons, the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline (Bic, 100m) was injected directly into the DR during HFS. Neurons inhibited by HFS recovered their firing rate during Bic+HFS (P<0.01, n=15, seven rats) to levels not different from baseline. Cells that were not affected by HFS did not change firing rate during Bic+HFS (P=0.968, n=7, three rats). These results indicate that blocking GABA(A) reverses HFS-mediated inhibition of DR neurons. As the cells that were not inhibited by HFS were also unaffected by HFS+Bic, they are probably not innervated by local GABA. Taken together, our results suggest that mPFC-HFS may exert a preferential effect on DR neurons with GABA(A) receptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available