4.8 Article

High Performance Lithium-Ion Hybrid Capacitors Employing Fe3O4-Graphene Composite Anode and Activated Carbon Cathode

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 20, Pages 17137-17145

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b03452

Keywords

lithium-ion capacitor; electrode material; graphene; Fe3O4; prelithiation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472238, 51677182]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z171100000917007]
  3. Beijing Nova Program [Z171100001117073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-ion capacitors (LICs) are considered as promising energy storage devices to realize excellent electrochemical performance, with high energy-power output. In this work, we employed a simple method to synthesize a composite electrode material consisting of Fe3O4 nanocrystallites mechanically anchored among the layers of three-dimensional arrays of graphene (Fe3O4-G), which exhibits several advantages compared with other traditional electrode materials, such as high Li storage capacity (820 mAh g(-1) at 0.1 A g(-1)), high electrical conductivity, and improved electrochemical stability. Furthermore, on the basis of the appropriated charge balance between cathode and anode, we successfully fabricated Fe3O4-G//activated carbon (AC) soft-packaging LICs with a high energy density of 120.0 Wh kg(-1), an outstanding power density of 45.4 kW kg(-1) (achieved at 60.5 Wh kg(-1)), and an excellent capacity retention of up to 94.1% after 1000 cycles and 81.4% after 10 000 cycles. The energy density of the Fe3O4-G//AC hybrid device is comparable with Ni-metal hydride batteries, and its capacitive power capability and cycle life is on par with supercapacitors (SCs). Therefore, this lithium-ion hybrid capacitor is expected to bridge the gap between Li-ion battery and SCs and gain bright prospects in next-generation energy storage fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available